|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
melhores cassino para ganhar dinheiro What would be the best way to counter this? My ideas so far are: 1) Steal less aggressively. I can open π hands that are either good enough to call or 4b. The downside with this is that I would be losing π EV, as even though regs are over 3 betting me, they still overfold to steal at a solid rate. (Regs π are folding 50-55% to SB steal as opposed to a proper fold freq of ~40%). Also I am worried that π I would be playing too many big pots OOP, as their frequency wouldn't necessarily go down just because I am π calling much more. 2) Start 4 betting and 4 bet Jamming recklessly to try and lower their 3 bet frequency. This π strategy is very high variance and kind of worries me, but I think it is likely the best approach. The π main issue though is that I have no access to preflop ranges that show what the proper response is and π what hands to 4 bet or jam with. So far my idea is to start jamming some 55-88, AQo-ATo, KQo-KJo, π A2s-A5s, and I would mix some combos of QQ+/AKo for balance. I would probably also 4 bet to a size π of 2.8 with ATs+, the remaining combos of 99+, and maybe some 54s-76s. Again I have no idea if this is π a proper range to counter with this is just what makes sense to me intuitively. 3) Last idea I have is π to incorporate a limping range. The downside would be the 500 NL rake likely makes limping -EV. I would think π that regs would also iso to a really unbearable size (5x+) that would make most ranges I find inaccurate and π my life really annoying. I also have zero experience with limping from the SB in 6 max cash, so the π amount of work and buying new ranges is also a negative to this approach. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Great SportingBet promotions Plenty of deposit / withdrawal methods In-Play match visuals Statistics & Results |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
endereço:Rua 29 de Junho,23- Alto do Tancredo, Teixeira de Freitas BA Brasil Contate-nos:+55 41 996883158 sitemap7 |